Kinship Analysis of Several Genotypes of Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) Based on Determinants of Kinship Components
Analisis Kekerabatan Beberapa Genotipe Kedelai (Glycine max L. Merrill) Berdasarkan Komponen Penentu Kekerabatan
-
(1) * Agus Miftakhurrohmat
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo
Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The Success to realize a new superior soybean variety is definitely by a genetic an phenotypic variability. Morphological relationships among soybean genotypes is necessary to orchid breeder in obtaining good hybrids in perennial plants. Openly related among soybean genotypes would increase their crossing opportunity. The aim of this research was to identify morphological relationships of ten soybean genotypes based relative determinant components. The research was carried out on the August until November 2005, at the experiment field of the Jember State Polytechnic and in the Biomolecular Laboratory of the Jember University. The experiment designed in Randomized Block Design (RBD), with ten soybean genotypes as treatment in the three replications. Relationships among of ten soybean genotypes was analyzed according to Cluster Analysis. The result of cluster analysis indicated that, (1) However the genotypes ZKJ 2-3 and ZKJ 1-7 are the most identical on similarity distance 0.0025. On similarity distance more than 0.9965, genotypes ZKJ 1-7 and 482 is different exclusively (2) On minimum distance 0.100 all of genotypes soybean can be divide four groups i.e. Group I (55, 56, 481, 482, Galunggung and 52), group II (ZKJ 2-3 and ZKJ 1-7), group III (I10), and group IV (Lokon).
References
Adiningsih, Sri J, M Soepartini, A Kusno, Mulyadi dan Wiwik Hartati. 1994. Teknologi untuk Meningkatkan Produktivitas Lahan Sawah dan Lahan Kering. Prosiding Temu Konsultasi Sumberdaya Lahan Untuk Pembangunan Kawasan Timur Indonesia di Palu 17 – 20 Januari 1994.
--------------. 2001a. Varietas Unggul Kedelai Hasil Pemuliaan Mutasi Radiasi. http://www.infonuklir.com.tips/. Accessed Jul 21, 2004
--------------. 2001b. Produksi Kedelai Nasional Belum Cukup. http://agribisnis.tripod. com/Last Update: 24 Agustus 2001. Accessed Jul 21, 2004
--------------. 2003. Pendahuluan-Kedelai. Bank Indonesia. http://www.bi.go.id/sipuk/lm/ind/kedelai/. Accessed Jul 21, 2004
Beer, S. C., J. Goffreda, T. D. Phillips, J. P. Murphy and M. E. Sorrel. 1993. Assesment of Genetic Variation in Avena sterilis Using Morphological Traits, Isozymes and RFLPs. Crop Sci. 33 (7): 1386-1393.
Bradford, M. M. 1976. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantitative of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein Dye Binding. Anal Biochem. 72: 248-254.
Everitt, B.S. 1993. Cluster Analysis. Third Edition. Halsted Press an Imprint of John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York.
Gaspersz, V. 1995. Teknik Analisis dalam Penelitian Percobaan. Tarsito. Bandung
Gurdev, S. Khush. 2002. Food Security By Design: Improving The Rice Plant in Partnership With NARS. Makalah Disampaikan Pada Seminar IPTEK Padi Pekan Padi Nasional di Sukamandi 22 Maret 2002.
Hadiati, S. 2003a. Hubungan Kekerabatan dan Jarak Genetik Beberapa Aksesi Nanas Berdasarkan Karakter Kuantitatif. Stigma 11 (2): 107-110.
---------. 2003b. Pendugaan Jarak Genetik dan Hubungan Kekerabatan Nanas Berdasarkan Analisis Isozim. Hortikultura. 13 (2): 87-94.
Kartikaningrum, S., N. Hermiati, A. Baihaki, M. Haeruman dan N. Toruan-Mathius. 2002. Kekerabatan Antar Genus Anggrek Sub Tribe Sarcanthinae Berdasarkan Data Fenotip dan Pola Pita DNA. Zuriat. 13 (1): 1-10.
Lamadji, S. 1998. Pemberdayaan Sifat Morfologi untuk Analisis Kekerabatan Plasma Nutfah Tebu. Buletin P3GI. 148 (9): 17-31
Mattjik, A. A., I. M. Sumertajaya, H.Wijayanto, Indahwati, A. Kurnia, dan B. Sartono. 2002. Aplikasi Analisis Peubah Ganda. Jurusan Statistika Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
Mulyarto, A. R., 2000. Kajian Penggunaan Minyak Kedelai sebagai Bahan Penyamak pada Pembuatan Kulit Chamos (Chamois Leather). Teknologi Pertanian. 1 (2) 8-14
Pitojo, S. 2003. Benih Kedelai. Kanisius.Yogyakarta. Purwantoro, A., E. Ambarwati1 dan F Setyaningsih. 2005. Kekerabatan Antar Anggrek Spesies Berdasarkan Sifat Morfologi Tanaman dan Bunga. Ilmu Pertanian. 12 (1): 1-11.
Ruswandi, D., I. Ina, Annisa, N. Rostini dan M. Rachmady. 2005. Evaluasi Venotipik Komponen Hasil dan Hasil Jagung Semi Plasma Nutfah Jagung Indonesia di Jatinagor. Kultivasi. 4 (2): 85-94
Santoso, S. 2002. Buku Latihan SPSS Statistik Multivariat. Elek Komputindo. Jakarta.
Sudarmadji, S., Haryono dan Suhardi. 1989. Prosedur Analisa Untuk Bahan Makanan dan Pertanian. Liberty. Yogyakarta.
Suhermiatien, T.. 2004. Analisis Kekerabatan Berdasarkan 12 Komponen Hasil pada Beberapa Genotipe Kedelai (Glicine max (L) Merrill). Tesis. Unej. Jember. Tidak Dipublikasikan.
Suprapto, J., 2004. Analisis Multivariat Arti dan Interpretasinya. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta.
Sutaryo, B., A. Purwantoro dan Nasrulla. 2003. Heterosis Standar Hasil Gabah dan Analisis Lintasan Beberapa Kombinasi Persilangan Padi pada Tanah Berpengairan Teknis. Ilmu Pertanian. 10 (2): 70-78
Copyright (c) 2010 Agus Miftakhurrohmat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
